Rechercher dans ce blog

Wednesday, June 30, 2021

Bill Cosby freed from prison, his sex conviction overturned - The Associated Press

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Pennsylvania’s highest court threw out Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction and released him from prison Wednesday in a stunning reversal of fortune for the comedian once known as “America’s Dad,” ruling that the prosecutor who brought the case was bound by his predecessor’s agreement not to charge Cosby.

Cosby, 83, flashed the V-for-victory sign to a helicopter overhead as he trudged into his suburban Philadelphia home after serving nearly three years of a three- to 10-year sentence for drugging and violating Temple University sports administrator Andrea Constand in 2004.

The former “Cosby Show” star — the first celebrity tried and convicted in the #MeToo era — had no comment as he arrived, and just smiled and nodded later at a news conference outside, where his lawyer Jennifer Bonjean said: “We are thrilled to have Mr. Cosby home.”

“He served three years of an unjust sentence and he did it with dignity and principle,” she added.

In a statement, Constand and her lawyers called the ruling disappointing, and they, like many other advocates, expressed fear that it could discourage sexual assault victims from coming forward. “We urge all victims to have their voices heard,” they added.

Cosby was arrested in 2015, when a district attorney armed with newly unsealed evidence — the comic’s damaging deposition in a lawsuit brought by Constand — filed charges against him just days before the 12-year statute of limitations was about to run out.

But the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said Wednesday that District Attorney Kevin Steele, who made the decision to arrest Cosby, was obligated to stand by his predecessor’s promise not to charge Cosby, though there was no evidence that agreement was ever put in writing.

Justice David Wecht, writing for a split court, said Cosby had relied on the previous district attorney’s decision not to charge him when the comedian gave his potentially incriminating testimony in Constand’s civil case.

The court called Cosby’s subsequent arrest “an affront to fundamental fairness, particularly when it results in a criminal prosecution that was forgone for more than a decade.” It said justice and “fair play and decency” require that the district attorney’s office stand by the decision of the previous DA.

The justices said that overturning the conviction and barring any further prosecution “is the only remedy that comports with society’s reasonable expectations of its elected prosecutors and our criminal justice system.”

Cosby was promptly set free from the state prison in suburban Montgomery County and driven home.

“What we saw today was justice, justice for all Americans,” said another Cosby attorney, Andrew Wyatt. ”Mr. Cosby’s conviction being overturned is for the world and all Americans who are being treated unfairly by the judicial system and some bad officers.”

Bonjean said Cosby was “extremely happy to be home” and “looks forward to reuniting with his wife and children.” Several supporters outside yelled, “Hey, hey, hey!” — the catchphrase of Cosby’s animated Fat Albert character — which brought a smile from him.

In a statement, Steele, the district attorney, said Cosby went free “on a procedural issue that is irrelevant to the facts of the crime.” He commended Constand for coming forward and added: “My hope is that this decision will not dampen the reporting of sexual assaults by victims.”

“I am furious to hear this news,” actor Amber Tamblyn, a founder of Time’s Up, an advocacy group for sex-crime victims, said on Twitter. “I personally know women who this man drugged and raped while unconscious. Shame on the court and this decision.”

But “Cosby Show” co-star Phylicia Rashad tweeted: “FINALLY!!!! A terrible wrong is being righted — a miscarriage of justice is corrected!”

Four Supreme Court justices formed the majority that ruled in Cosby’s favor, while three others dissented in whole or in part.

Peter Goldberger, a suburban Philadelphia lawyer with an expertise in criminal appeals, said prosecutors could ask the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for reargument or reconsideration, but it would be a very long shot.

“I can’t imagine that with such a lengthy opinion, with a thoughtful concurring opinion and a thoughtful dissenting opinion, that you could honestly say they made a simple mistake that would change their minds if they point it out to them,” Goldberger said.

Even though Cosby was charged only with the assault on Constand, the judge at his trial allowed five other accusers to testify that they, too, were similarly victimized by Cosby in the 1980s. Prosecutors called them as witnesses to establish what they said was a pattern of behavior on Cosby’s part.

Cosby’s lawyers had argued on appeal that the use of the five additional accusers was improper. But the Pennsylvania high court did not weigh in on the question, saying it was moot, given the finding that Cosby should not have been prosecuted in the first place.

In sentencing Cosby, the trial judge had declared him a sexually violent predator who could not be safely allowed out in public and needed to report to authorities for the rest of his life.

In May, Cosby was denied parole after refusing to participate in sex offender programs behind bars. He said he would resist the treatment programs and refuse to acknowledge wrongdoing even if it meant serving the full 10 years.

The groundbreaking Black actor grew up in public housing in Philadelphia and made a fortune estimated at $400 million during his 50 years in the entertainment industry that included the TV shows “I Spy,” “The Cosby Show” and “Fat Albert,” along with comedy albums and a multitude of television commercials.

The suburban Philadelphia prosecutor who originally looked into Constand’s allegations, Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor, considered the case flawed because Constand waited a year to come forward and stayed in contact with Cosby afterward. Castor declined to prosecute and instead encouraged Constand to sue for damages.

Questioned under oath as part of that lawsuit, Cosby said he used to offer quaaludes to women he wanted to have sex with. He eventually settled with Constand for $3.4 million.

Portions of the deposition later became public at the request of The Associated Press and spelled Cosby’s downfall, opening the floodgates on accusations from other women and destroying the comic’s good-guy reputation and career. More than 60 women came forward to say Cosby violated them.

The AP does not typically identify sexual assault victims without their permission, which Constand has granted.

Cosby, in the deposition, acknowledged giving quaaludes to a 19-year-old woman before having sex with her at a Las Vegas hotel in 1976. Cosby called the encounter consensual.

On Wednesday, the woman, Therese Serignese, now 64, said the court ruling “takes my breath away.”

“I just think it’s a miscarriage of justice. This is about procedure. It’s not about the truth of the women,” she said. Serignese said she took solace in the fact Cosby served nearly three years behind bars: “That’s as good as it gets in America” for sex crime victims.

___

This story has been corrected to show that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did not express an opinion on the use of additional accusers

___

Follow Maryclaire Dale on Twitter at https://twitter.com/Maryclairedale

Adblock test (Why?)


Bill Cosby freed from prison, his sex conviction overturned - The Associated Press
Read More

Britney Spears' conservator slams Jamie Spears' claims she blocked star's personal care, medical freedom - Fox News

Britney Spearsconservatorship team is apparently experiencing some in-house schism.

On Tuesday, the pop star’s father submitted a court filing claiming his daughter’s court-appointed attorney, Samuel Ingham III, and temporary conservator of her person, Jodi Montgomery, are the people pulling the strings which the singer alleges disallowed her to freely make her own decisions regarding medical and personal care choices.

James P. Spears – otherwise known as Jamie – said in the filing obtained by Fox News that Montgomery "has served continuously as the sole Conservator of the Person of Ms. Spears since September 2019 and continues to serve in that capacity."

"Ms. Montgomery has been fully in charge of Ms. Spears' personal care and medical treatment in consultations with Mr. Ingham – and which consultations specifically excluded Mr. Spears. Mr. Spears, therefore, was greatly saddened to hear of his daughter's difficulties and suffering, and he believes that there must be an investigation into those claims," the court filing reads.

Jamie is now calling for an evidentiary hearing in order for the court to determine whether or not to grant Ingham III's petition to appoint Montgomery as a permanent conservator. He also stated that Britney's claims in court made last week – the most damning that she has been prevented from removing an intrauterine device (IUD) – have left him concerned.

BRITNEY SPEARS' FATHER JAMIE SPEARS BLAMES JODI MONTGOMERY FOR BLOCKING STAR'S PERSONAL CARE, MEDICAL FREEDOM

The singer's father claims he's been completely "cut-off" from communicating with his daughter in any capacity.

#FreeBritney activists protest at Los Angeles Grand Park during a conservatorship hearing for Britney Spears on June 23, 2021, in Los Angeles, Calif. (Photo by Rich Fury/Getty Images)

#FreeBritney activists protest at Los Angeles Grand Park during a conservatorship hearing for Britney Spears on June 23, 2021, in Los Angeles, Calif. (Photo by Rich Fury/Getty Images)

Now, Montgomery – whom Britney has raved about through her attorney in the past – is responding to Jamie Spears’ filing and claims through a statement released by her attorney Lauriann Wright that while Britney's conservatorship "includes multiple layers of protection" Montgomery has "unequivocally been a tireless advocate for Britney and for her well-being."

"Ms. Montgomery is a licensed private professional fiduciary who, unlike family members who serve as conservators, is required to follow a Code of Ethics," the statement reads. "While she does not control Britney’s financial assets, she is responsible for her personal care, and if Britney wants any issue brought up to the Court, Ms. Montgomery is and has always been ready, willing, and able to do so."

FEDERLINE MAY REQUEST EVALUATION BEFORE BRITNEY SPEARS’ CONSERVATORSHIP ENDS

The statement further maintains that since Montgomery was appointed as temporary conservator of Britney's person in September 2019, "Ms. Montgomery and the medical team that she assembled have had one primary goal – to assist and encourage Britney in her path to no longer needing a conservatorship of the person."

The statement also slammed Britney’s court account in which she stated for the record that the conservatorship has blocked her from getting married and removing her contraceptive in order to have more kids as "unaffected" by the conservatorship, citing Probate Code §1900.

Britney Spears' father Jamie. 

Britney Spears' father Jamie.  (Getty Images)

"As to family planning, that is also unaffected by the conservatorship," the memorandum states. "If Britney needs any assistance with either, Ms. Montgomery has and will be there to provide any assistance needed to Britney."

"Britney’s choice to marry and to start a family have never been impacted by the conservatorship while Ms. Montgomery has been conservator of the person," the statement pressed.

INSIDE BRITNEY SPEARS, SAM ASGHARI’S HAWAIIAN GETAWAY FOLLOWING BOMBSHELL CONSERVATORSHIP HEARING: REPORT

Montgomery’s attorney writes that her client has acted in Britney’s best interest since her first day on the job and said all of the decisions that have been made were approved by her doctors and the oversight of the court.

"Because Ms. Montgomery does not have any power or authority over the conservatorship of the estate, every expenditure made by Ms. Montgomery for Britney has had to be first approved by Jamie Spears as the conservator of the estate," the statement reads in response to Jamie Spears’ claim that he has been cast aside in the decision-making processes within the conservatorship.

"Some expenses are pre-approved, but if new services or an increase in existing services is sought, Mr. Spears has to approve that expenditure," it continues. "Practically speaking, since everything costs money, no expenditures can happen without going through Mr. Spears and Mr. Spears approving them."

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

"Ms. Montgomery has advocated on Britney’s behalf for any expenditures that Britney has requested as well as for expenditures recommended by Britney’s medical team," it reads, adding that "not every requested expenditure has been approved" and "Jamie Spears, as conservator of the estate, has a duty to make decisions in the best interests of the estate, and sometimes that has meant requested expenditures have been denied or limited."

A source familiar with the matter relayed to People magazine on Tuesday that Montgomery is "working with a team of experts concentrated on giving Britney the tools to get better" and "the hope is that [Britney] can eventually get out of the conservatorship."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Montgomery’s attorney echoed the sentiment in her statement on Wednesday, writing; "While it is Ms. Montgomery’s professional duty to be Britney’s protector and advocate, honoring her wishes and seeing to her best interests while Britney is under conservatorship, it is her sincere personal wish that Britney continues to make meaningful progress in her well-being so that her conservatorship of the person can be terminated."

"Ms. Montgomery looks forward to presenting a comprehensive Care Plan to the Court setting forth a path for termination of the conservatorship for Britney," the statement concludes, "and Ms. Montgomery looks forward to supporting Britney through that process."

Fox News' Melissa Roberto contributed to this report

Adblock test (Why?)


Britney Spears' conservator slams Jamie Spears' claims she blocked star's personal care, medical freedom - Fox News
Read More

William and Harry expected to have a 'dignified' reunion amid rift - Page Six

Princes William and Harry will be “dignified” as they reunite at Thursday’s unveiling of the Princess Diana memorial amid their long-running rift, sources who know them both say.

However, it’s not believed that the brothers will have time to have a heart-to-heart before Harry heads back to the US following the event, Page Six is told.

They will meet up at Kensington Palace, where they lived with their mother as young boys, to unveil a statue dedicated to her upon her 60th birthday.

There will be just 15 guests at the event due to COVID protocols, including Diana’s sisters, Lady Sarah McCorquodale and Lady Jane Fellowes, and her brother, Charles, Earl Spencer.

While a royal source said the event could be “sad and a little strained,” another told us they expect the brothers to be dignified for the sake of their mother.

“The boys will be fine,” the source said.

We’re told it will only be a brief event, with other guests including members of the statue committee, the sculptor Ian Rank-Broadley and the garden designer Pip Morrison.

Despite reports, this will leave the brothers no time to have any private meeting, particularly with the media just steps away, it was pointed out.

Diana’s former chief of staff Patrick Jephson told us the statue unveiling is sure to “inspire feelings of love” for their mother, who died in 1997.

“The princes were still young when they lost their mother, and the depth of emotion they feel in remembering her can only be imagined,” Jephson said. “To their credit, they have said that they hope the statue will remind us of her positive impact on the world. That’s certainly worth celebrating so, alongside sadness, we can be sure the unveiling will inspire happier feelings of love for an irreplaceable parent, and pride in her enduring legacy.”

Princess Diana is pictured with sons Prince William and Prince Harry in 1985.
Princess Diana with sons Prince William and Prince Harry in 1985.
Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty Images

It’s not yet known when Harry, 36, will return home to California to wife Meghan Markle, son Archie and newborn daughter Lilibet, but he is not believed to want to stay away too long.

On Wednesday, Harry was a surprise guest at the WellChild Awards at Kew Gardens after leaving self-isolation following five days in quarantine at Frogmore Cottage, his UK home.

The Duke of Sussex, who landed in the UK on Friday, was allowed to leave his Windsor home after testing negative for coronavirus.

The WellChild event, which celebrates inspirational young people living with serious illnesses, was originally scheduled for September, but the organizers changed the date to allow Harry — the charity’s patron since 2007 — to attend.

A source told the Sun: “WellChild is a charity that is very close to Harry’s heart and the organizers have moved heaven and earth to make this happen.

“His attendance was kept a complete secret and it was an amazing moment when he surprised those in attendance.

“Harry made sure he spent time talking to as many of the children and their families as possible — as well as caregivers who were present at the ceremony.”

Kate Middleton, Prince William, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attend a Commonwealth Day service in 2019.
Kate Middleton, Prince William, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attend a Commonwealth Day service in 2019.
Shutterstock

As we reported, 39-year-old William, his wife, Kate Middleton — who will not be at the event — and their three children will tour the memorial privately ahead of the unveiling.

Adblock test (Why?)


William and Harry expected to have a 'dignified' reunion amid rift - Page Six
Read More

Bill Cosby released after sexual assault conviction overturned by Pennsylvania Supreme Court - NBC News

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturned the sexual assault conviction of Bill Cosby on Wednesday and ordered his release from prison after finding that he was denied protection against self-incrimination.

The court said that a prosecutor's decision not to charge Cosby, 83, opened the door for him to speak freely in a lawsuit against him and that testimony was key in his conviction years later by another prosecutor.

Cosby was convicted on three felony counts of aggravated indecent assault in 2018 of drugging and sexually assaulting a woman in 2004, and was serving a three- to 10-year sentence. He has served nearly three years of the sentence.

The state Supreme Court said Cosby cannot be retried on the same charges.

June 30, 202102:41

"When an unconditional charging decision is made publicly and with the intent to induce action and reliance by the defendant, and when the defendant does so to his detriment (and in some instances upon the advice of counsel), denying the defendant the benefit of that decision is an affront to fundamental fairness," according to the high court opinion authored by Justice David Wecht.

"For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged."

The prosecution of Cosby was one of the first major milestones of the #MeToo movement, as women came forward with their tales of unwanted sexual advances and harassment in the workplace.

Cosby’s spokesman Andrew Wyatt thanked the comedian's legal team and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, calling Wednesday's ruling a moment of justice for Black Americans.

"This is the justice Mr. Cosby has been fighting for," Wyatt said in a statement. "They saw the light. He waived his Fifth Amendment right and settled out of court. He was given a deal and he had immunity. He should have never been charged."

June 30, 202102:35

About two hours after the ruling was published on Wednesday, Cosby was released from the SCI Phoenix detention center about 35 miles northeast of Philadelphia, where he had been housed as inmate No. NN7687, a corrections official said.

Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele lamented Cosby’s release and characterized the state high court’s findings as a “procedural issue.”

“He was found guilty by a jury and now goes free on a procedural issue that is irrelevant to the facts of the crime,” Steele said in a statement.

“I want to commend Cosby’s victim Andrea Constand for her bravery in coming forward and remaining steadfast throughout this long ordeal, as well as all of the other women who have shared similar experiences. My hope is that this decision will not dampen the reporting of sexual assaults by victims.”

The entertainer once dubbed “America’s Dad” was sent to state prison following his 2018 conviction for drugging and sexually assaulting Constand.

She testified that Cosby assaulted her at his Pennsylvania home in 2004 after she came to him for career advice.

But Bruce Castor, the Montgomery district attorney at the time, declined to press charges against the comedian and actor, "thereby allowing Cosby to be forced to testify in a subsequent civil action," according to the high court.

"Unable to invoke any right not to testify in the civil proceedings, Cosby relied upon the district attorney’s declination and proceeded to provide four sworn depositions. During those depositions, Cosby made several incriminating statements," Justice Wecht wrote in a 79-page opinion, joined by Justices Debra Todd, Christine Donohue and Sallie Updyke Mundy.

"The fruits of Cosby’s reliance upon D.A. Castor’s decision — Cosby’s sworn inculpatory testimony — were then used by D.A. Castor’s successors against Cosby at Cosby’s criminal trial."

Justice Kevin Dougherty sided with the majority and said large swaths of Cosby's prosecution amounted to a "coercive bait-and-switch," after Castor did not push a criminal case.

But Dougherty said vacating the conviction was not a proper remedy and argued that Cosby could be tried again, just without evidence obtained from the comedian's civil suit deposition.

"We can order it suppressed," wrote Dougherty, as he was joined by Chief Justice Max Baer. "And in fact this is precisely what this Court and many others have done in comparable situations."

Justice Thomas Saylor wrote in dissent and said Castor's decision not to prosecute Cosby was never set in stone for all following district attorneys.

Castor's action was just "a present exercise of prosecutorial discretion by the temporary occupant of the elected office of district attorney that would in no way be binding upon his own future decision-making processes, let alone those of his successor," Saylor wrote.

The Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) decried the state high court ruling.

“We are deeply disappointed in today’s ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and by the message this decision sends to the brave survivors who came forward to seek justice for what Bill Cosby did to them," RAINN President Scott Berkowitz said in a statement. "This is not justice.”

And Christian Nunes, president of the National Organization for Women, bemoaned Cosby's release as the result of a "technicality."

"Today, the judicial system in America failed survivors again," Nunes said in a statement.

"The Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturned Bill Cosby’s conviction for sexual assault not because anyone doubted his guilt of numerous crimes, but because of a prior legal agreement’s impact on the trial. Bill Cosby is free on a technicality, but the women he assaulted, who bravely came forward to bring him to justice, are suffering anew. They thought they had finally achieved some limited measure of closure — and now this."

In a rare jailhouse interview in 2019, Cosby said he wouldn't offer any remorse for his actions — even if that would've affected a parole board's decision.

"When I come up for parole, they're not going to hear me say that I have remorse. I was there. I don't care what group of people come along and talk about this when they weren't there. They don't know," Cosby told the news outlet BlackPressUSA.com.

Adblock test (Why?)


Bill Cosby released after sexual assault conviction overturned by Pennsylvania Supreme Court - NBC News
Read More

Britney Spears' father Jamie Spears blames Jodi Montgomery for blocking star's personal care, medical freedom - Fox News

Jamie Spears claims his daughter Britney Spears's court-appointed conservator Jodi Montgomery and her attorney Samuel Ingham III are the ones who have failed to give her freedom to make her own medical and personal care choices under her 13-year conservatorship.

In new court documents obtained by Fox News, Jamie, 68, on Monday argued he has no authority over Spears' personal care and medical desires following her bombshell claims made in court on June 23. He claimed he has not had authority because Montgomery "has served continuously as the sole Conservator of the Person of Ms. Spears since September 2019 and continues to serve in that capacity."

"Ms. Montgomery has been fully in charge of Ms. Spears' personal care and medical treatment in consultations with Mr. Ingham – and which consultations specifically excluded Mr. Spears. Mr. Spears, therefore, was greatly saddened to hear of his daughter's difficulties and suffering, and he believes that there must be an investigation into those claims," the court docs continue.

Jamie is now calling for an evidentiary hearing in order for the court to determine whether or not to grant Ingham III's petition to appoint Montgomery. He also claimed that Britney's claims in court made last week – the most damning that she has been prevented from removing an IUD – have left him concerned.

FEDERLINE MAY REQUEST EVALUATION BEFORE BRITNEY SPEARS’ CONSERVATORSHIP ENDS

FILE - Jamie Spears, father of singer Britney Spears, leaves the Stanley Mosk Courthouse on Oct. 24, 2012, in Los Angeles. When Britney Spears speaks to a judge at her own request on Wednesday, June. 23, 2021, she'll do it 13 years into a court-enforced conservatorship that has exercised vast control of her life and money by her father. Spears has said the conservatorship saved her from collapse and exploitation. But she has sought more control over how it operates, and says she wants her father out. 

FILE - Jamie Spears, father of singer Britney Spears, leaves the Stanley Mosk Courthouse on Oct. 24, 2012, in Los Angeles. When Britney Spears speaks to a judge at her own request on Wednesday, June. 23, 2021, she'll do it 13 years into a court-enforced conservatorship that has exercised vast control of her life and money by her father. Spears has said the conservatorship saved her from collapse and exploitation. But she has sought more control over how it operates, and says she wants her father out.  (AP Photo/Nick Ut, File)

"On September 9, 2019, Mr. Spears relinquished his powers as Conservator of the Person in favor of Ms. Montgomery. Unlike Ms. Montgomery and Mr. Ingham, Mr. Spears does not speak or meet with Ms. Spears' medical team, and he is not permitted to nor does he have the opportunity to provide any input into his daughter's current medical treatment, diagnosis, or therapy. Nor does Mr. Spears participate in or discuss Ms. Spears' personal affairs with her, such as issues related to her self-care, marriage, and reproductive desires. These are issues under the purview off Ms. Montgomery as Ms. Spears' conservator of the person, and issues that Ms. Spears presumably discusses with her court-appointed attorney, Mr. Ingham," Jamie's filing continues.

Additionally, Jamie claimed that Britney did not sign "nor verified" a petition filed by her attorney to appoint Montgomery as conservator of his person. 

The famous father added that he's been barred from having any communication with the "Toxic" singer, 39.

"Mr. Spears is simply not involved in any decisions related to Ms. Spears' personal care or reproductive issues. Furthermore, Mr. Spears is unable to hear and address his daughter's concerns directly because he has been cut-off from communicating with her.

BRITNEY SPEARS' CONSERVATOR JODI MONTGOMERY IS 'CONCENTRATED' ON GIVING STAR 'TOOLS TO GET BETTER': REPORT

Jamie Spears claims he has been cut off from communicating with the pop star and is not to blame for her lack of freedom under her current conservatorship.

Jamie Spears claims he has been cut off from communicating with the pop star and is not to blame for her lack of freedom under her current conservatorship. (Getty Images)

Jamie further claims Ingham "incorrectly" communicated to the court that his daughter's "incapacity to consent to any form of medical treatment was determined by order filed" on Oct. 10, 2014.

"But there was no such finding, and there is no such order," Jamie argues. "Nonetheless, based on this false premise, Mr. Ingham seeks and order from the Court taking away Ms. Spears' right to give informed consent for her own medical treatment."

Despite the lack of recent communication with Britney, Jamie claimed that he "dutifully served in various conservator roles for over thirteen years on behalf of his daughter, whom he loves unconditionally."

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

 On June 23, 2021, Britney Spears addressed the court calling the legal guardianship 'abusive' and asking the judge to terminate it.

 On June 23, 2021, Britney Spears addressed the court calling the legal guardianship 'abusive' and asking the judge to terminate it. (Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP, File)

Following his daughter's testimony in court on June 23, Jamie argues that it's "unclear whether it is appropriate for Ms. Montgomery to serve in that role or for that matter, whether the continued conservatorship of Ms. Spears' person is appropriate."

In response, an attorney for Montgomery issued a statement on Wednesday, which was obtained by Fox News.

"I can state unequivocally that Jodi Montgomery has been a tireless advocate for Britney and for her well-being," the statement reads in part. "While she does not control Britney’s financial assets, she is responsible for her personal care, and if Britney wants any issue brought up to the Court, Ms. Montgomery is and has always been ready, willing, and able to do so.  From the very beginning of her appointment in September 2019, Ms. Montgomery and the medical team that she assembled have had one primary goal – to assist and encourage Britney in her path to no longer needing a conservatorship of the person."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

On June 23, Spears delivered an impassioned plea to a Los Angeles court to end the longstanding control it has over her life. The singer claimed that under her conservatorship she's blocked from getting married and removing her contraceptive in order to have more kids. 

"I want changes and I want changes going forward," Spears ordered the court in her speech. The star went on to note that she doesn’t want to be evaluated to determine if she has regained her mental capacity.

"My family didn’t do a God d--m thing," she fumed. "Anything I had to do, [my dad] was the one who approved all of it. My whole family did nothing."

Spears' attorney did not immediately return Fox News' requests for comment.

Adblock test (Why?)


Britney Spears' father Jamie Spears blames Jodi Montgomery for blocking star's personal care, medical freedom - Fox News
Read More

William and Harry likely won't meet privately after Diana memorial - Page Six

Prince William and Prince Harry are not expected to meet in private after a statue of their late mother, Princess Diana, is unveiled Thursday, sources say.

Page Six is told that the brothers likely will not have time for a heart-to-heart amid their long-running rift before Harry flies back to his wife, Meghan Markle, and their two children in the US.

A private chat would also be particularly difficult with the media just steps away, it was pointed out to us — despite reports Wednesday saying the brothers would meet privately following the statue unveiling. 

It is not known when Harry, who arrived in the UK on Friday, will head back home, but it is believed that he doesn’t want to be away from his recently-expanded family for too long.

The statue unveiling falls on what would have been the late Princess of Wales’ 60th birthday.

There will be just 15 guests at the event due to COVID protocols, including Diana’s siblings. We’re told it will be short.

While a royal source said the event could be “sad and a little strained,” another source told us the brothers are expected to be dignified for the sake of their mother.

“The boys will be fine,” the source said.

Absent from the event will be William’s wife, Kate Middleton — which family sources previously told Page Six will be be “telling on so many levels.”

The Duchess of Cambridge was cut from the guest list in an effort to keep numbers down due to COVID-19 protocols, but an insider said it’s merely an excuse to keep the family drama away from the important ceremony.

“I think keeping the numbers down is a perfect ‘excuse’ for Catherine to stay away. William is fed up with the drama and Catherine doesn’t need to be dragged into this,” the source said.

Princess Diana, prince William and prince harry
The brothers, seen here with their mother Princess Diana in 1992, will unveil a statue in her honor on what would’ve been her 60th birthday.
AP

“They are planning a private family visit with their children, and that private moment is far more important than the public rhetoric.”

The source added, “William is determined that the Sussex drama does not overshadow this important moment of remembrance to his much-missed mother and is keeping that as his focus.”

Prince Charles, who divorced Diana a year before her 1997, will reportedly be absent from the event as well, as “old wounds” could be reopened.

“It brings back memories for him; happy, sad, regretful,” an insider told the UK Times. “Since Diana’s death, he has felt it’s best to keep those memories to himself and leave his sons to it.”

Markle remains in California, where she is caring for their newborn daughter, Lilibet Diana, and their 2-year-old son, Archie.

Adblock test (Why?)


William and Harry likely won't meet privately after Diana memorial - Page Six
Read More

Josh Duggar's sister, cousin agree with TLC's cancellation of 'Counting On': 'I stand with the network' - Fox News

Josh Duggar's sister and cousin are speaking out about TLC's decision to cancel "Counting On" in the wake of the disgraced star's child pornography charges.

The show served as a spin-off of "19 Kids and Counting" and followed members of the Duggar family.

Josh's younger sister Jinger Vuolo and her husband, Jeremy Vuolo, shared the same statement on their respective Instagram accounts on Tuesday, saying they agree with the network's decision.

"We are grateful for TLC giving us the opportunity to be on the network over the years and their kindness towards the Vuolo family. It's been a remarkable journey that has opened doors to traveling and experiencing the world in a way that we wouldn't have imagined possible," their statement begins.

'COUNTING ON' CANCELED AFTER 11 SEASONS AMID JOSH DUGGAR'S CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CASE

"We wholeheartedly agree with TLC's decision not to renew ‘Counting On’ and are excited for the next chapter in our lives. We'd like to thank our fans, friends and the amazing film crew who have shown us love and support. We look forward to continuing our creative journey in Los Angeles and seeing what the future holds," it concludes.

Duggar cousin Amy King, who appeared on the Duggar family's shows over the years, similarly thanked TLC "for the ride."

Aside a number of photos from her participation on the network, King wrote: "I'll treasure the memories, always. Also, I stand with the network in this decision!"

TLC announced their decision not to renew "Counting On" on Tuesday.

JOSH DUGGAR'S CHILD PORNOGRAPHY TRIAL PUSHED TO NOVEMBER 2021

 (L-R) Jeremy Vuolo and Jinger Duggar Vuolo released identical statements on Tuesday in support of TLC's decision not to renew ‘Counting On.’

 (L-R) Jeremy Vuolo and Jinger Duggar Vuolo released identical statements on Tuesday in support of TLC's decision not to renew ‘Counting On.’ (Michael Kovac/Getty Images for Discovery Channel)

"TLC will not be producing additional seasons of ‘Counting On,’" the network told Fox News in a statement. "TLC feels it is important to give the Duggar family the opportunity to address their situation privately."

News of the cancellation comes as Josh Duggar faces charges of child pornography. His trial was originally set for the coming weeks but has been pushed back to November

Duggar and his family appeared in "19 Kids" from 2008-2015. The show was canceled in 2015 when news broke that Duggar, now 33, had allegedly molested several young girls, four of them being his sisters.

Later that year, it was reported that Duggar owned an account on Ashley Madison, a website meant to facilitate extramarital affairs.

JOSH DUGGAR LIVING IN ‘EERIE, DESOLATE’ HOME WITH CUSTODIANS AS HE AWAITS CHILD PORNOGRAPHY TRIAL

‘Counting On,’ featuring various members of the Duggar family, has been canceled after 11 seasons on TLC. The show was a spin-off of ‘19 Kids and Counting.’  (Photo by D Dipasupil/Getty Images for Extra)

‘Counting On,’ featuring various members of the Duggar family, has been canceled after 11 seasons on TLC. The show was a spin-off of ‘19 Kids and Counting.’  (Photo by D Dipasupil/Getty Images for Extra)

Duggar did not appear in "Counting On," which ran from 2015-2020.

Now, he faces a new scandal after being arrested by U.S. Marshals on April 29, 2021 in Arkansas. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

One day later, he was indicted on federal child pornography charges and pleaded not guilty. He was granted release by a federal judge as he awaits his new November trial.

Amy King, right, said she stands by TLC's decision to cancel ‘Counting On.'

Amy King, right, said she stands by TLC's decision to cancel ‘Counting On.' (Washington County Sheriff's/Getty)

Court records filed on Tuesday in the Western District of Arkansas and obtained by Fox News reveal that Judge Timothy L. Brooks has ordered the trial be moved from its previously scheduled date of July 6, 2021, to November 30, 2021.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

Duggar had previously requested the trial be pushed to February 2022 which federal prosecutors balked at but said they were not opposed to moving it back three months or so.

The former reality star was charged with one count of receipt of child pornography and one count of possession of child pornography.

Fox News' Nate Day contributed to this report.

Adblock test (Why?)


Josh Duggar's sister, cousin agree with TLC's cancellation of 'Counting On': 'I stand with the network' - Fox News
Read More

Richard Belzer, Extraordinarily Smart-Ass as a Comic and a TV Cop, Dies at 78 - Hollywood Reporter

Richard Belzer, the beloved comedian who began as an edgy stand-up performer before finding further fame as the cynical but stalwart detect...